What is the main difference between PocketBase and Supabase?

PocketBase and Supabase are both backend-as-a-service (baas) tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: PocketBase or Supabase?

The choice between PocketBase and Supabase depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from PocketBase to Supabase?

Migration between PocketBase and Supabase is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.

Visit Docmost

Learn more

PocketBase vs Supabase

Learn how PocketBase and Supabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.

PocketBase

A lightweight, self-hosted backend solution with real-time database, authentication, and file storage capabilities.

Visit PocketBase Read more

Stars
59,356
Forks
3,481
Last commit
3 days ago
Repository age
4 years
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes

Activity score

97/100

View Repository

Supabase

Provides a full backend stack built on Postgres: authentication, auto-generated APIs, edge functions, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and vector search.

Visit Supabase Read more

Stars
105,005
Forks
12,919
Last commit
3 hours ago
Repository age
7 years
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes

Activity score

100/100

View Repository

Detailed Comparison

Both PocketBase and Supabase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Supabase wins

Community & Popularity

Supabase leads in popularity with 105,005 stars vs 59,356 stars for PocketBase. The 77% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Supabase has 12,919 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with PocketBase last updated 3 days ago and Supabase 3 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: PocketBase uses Golang while Supabase leverages CSS, Bash, JSX, Python, Next.js, Rust, C, Objective-C, Vue, Swift, Kotlin, SvelteKit, Elixir, Tanstack Start, Dart.

Supabase wins

Project Maturity

Supabase has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to PocketBase which began 4 years ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests Supabase may have more mature features and established processes.

PocketBase wins

Licensing

PocketBase uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Supabase's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable