What is the main difference between PocketBase and Supabase?

PocketBase and Supabase are both backend-as-a-service (baas) tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: PocketBase or Supabase?

The choice between PocketBase and Supabase depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from PocketBase to Supabase?

Migration between PocketBase and Supabase is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.

Learn more

PocketBase vs Supabase

Learn how PocketBase and Supabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.

PocketBase

A lightweight, self-hosted backend solution with real-time database, authentication, and file storage capabilities.

Visit PocketBase Read more

61,611stars+350(+0.6%)

Last 30 days

This repository was archived by the owner and is no longer maintained.

Last commit
7 days ago
Repository age
4 years
Version
v0.40.6
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
pocketbase

Supabase

Provides a full backend stack built on Postgres: authentication, auto-generated APIs, edge functions, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and vector search.

Visit Supabase Read more

114,446stars+3,395(+3.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
7 years
Version
v1.26.08
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
supabase/supabase

Detailed Comparison

Supabase appears to have several advantages over PocketBase, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Supabase wins

Community & Popularity

Supabase leads in popularity with 114,446 stars vs 61,611 stars for PocketBase. The 86% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Supabase has 15,769 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Supabase wins

Growth Momentum

Supabase is growing faster, adding 3,395 stars in the last 30 days (+3.1%) against adding 350 stars for PocketBase (+0.6%). Supabase is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with PocketBase last updated 7 days ago and Supabase 9 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: PocketBase uses Golang while Supabase leverages CSS, Bash, JSX, Python, Next.js, Rust, C, Objective-C, Vue, Swift, Kotlin, SvelteKit, Elixir, Tanstack Start, Dart.

Supabase wins

Project Maturity

Supabase has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to PocketBase which began 4 years ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests Supabase may have more mature features and established processes.

PocketBase wins

Licensing

PocketBase uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Supabase's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable