PocketBase vs Supabase
Learn how PocketBase and Supabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.
Learn how PocketBase and Supabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these backend-as-a-service (baas) tools is best for you.
PocketBase
Auto-fetched .
Supabase
Stars
101,471Forks
12,189Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
Yes
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Both PocketBase and Supabase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both PocketBase and Supabase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Supabase leads in popularity with 101,471 stars vs 57,994 stars for PocketBase. The 75% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Supabase has 12,189 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with PocketBase last updated 3 days ago and Supabase 12 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: PocketBase uses Golang while Supabase leverages CSS, Bash, JSX, Python, Next.js, Rust, C, Objective-C, Vue, Swift, Kotlin, SvelteKit, Elixir, Tanstack Start, Dart.
Project Maturity
Supabase has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to PocketBase which began 4 years ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests Supabase may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
PocketBase uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Supabase's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS).
Hosting & Deployment
Both PocketBase and Supabase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
YNS – Commerce rebuilt for the agentic future; a Lovable-like platform where AI builds real Stripe-powered stores.