Learn how Authentik and Tesseral differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Authentik appears to have several advantages over Tesseral, particularly in popularity, growth, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Authentik significantly outpaces Tesseral in community adoption with 25,173 stars compared to 1,138 stars on GitHub. This 22.1x difference suggests Authentik has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Authentik has 1,963 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Authentik is growing faster, adding 2,663 stars in the last 30 days (+12%) against adding 0 stars for Tesseral (0%). Authentik is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Authentik shows more recent development activity with its last commit 5 hours ago, while Tesseral was last updated 6 months ago. This suggests Authentik is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authentik uses Bash, Python, Rust, Django.
Authentik has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Tesseral which began 2 years ago. This 4.9-year head start suggests Authentik may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authentik also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Authentik provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tesseral may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs