Learn how Authentik and Tesseral differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .


Authentik appears to have several advantages over Tesseral, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Authentik significantly outpaces Tesseral in community adoption with 21,151 stars compared to 1,124 stars on GitHub. This 18.8x difference suggests Authentik has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Authentik has 1,560 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Authentik shows more recent development activity with its last commit 34 minutes ago, while Tesseral was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Authentik is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authentik uses Bash, Python, Rust, Django.
Authentik has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Tesseral which began 1 year ago. This 4.9-year head start suggests Authentik may have more mature features and established processes.
Tesseral is licensed under MIT, while Authentik's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authentik also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Authentik provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tesseral may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs