Learn how Rowy and Teable differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 1 year and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Teable appears to have several advantages over Rowy, particularly in popularity, activity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Teable significantly outpaces Rowy in community adoption with 21,152 stars compared to 6,803 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests Teable has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Teable has 1,257 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Teable shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 hours ago, while Rowy was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests Teable is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Teable leverages Bash, Next.js, NestJS.
Rowy has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Teable which began 3 years ago. This 3.2-year head start suggests Rowy may have more mature features and established processes.
Teable is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Rowy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rowy also focuses on Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) while Teable extends into Collaborative Workspaces.
Teable provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rowy may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.