Learn how NocoBase and Teable differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both NocoBase and Teable have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both NocoBase and Teable show comparable community engagement with 22,152 and 21,140 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, NocoBase has 2,549 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with NocoBase last updated 8 hours ago and Teable 11 hours ago.
NocoBase has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Teable which began 3 years ago. This 2.0-year head start suggests NocoBase may have more mature features and established processes.
Teable is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while NocoBase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: NocoBase also focuses on PaaS & Deployment Tools while Teable extends into Collaborative Workspaces.
Both NocoBase and Teable offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.