Learn how Insomnia and Requestly differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Insomnia and Requestly have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Insomnia significantly outpaces Requestly in community adoption with 38,328 stars compared to 6,637 stars on GitHub. This 5.8x difference suggests Insomnia has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Insomnia has 2,279 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Insomnia last updated 3 days ago and Requestly 6 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Insomnia uses C, Objective-C, C++ while Requestly leverages SCSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Insomnia beginning 10 years ago and Requestly 9 years ago.
Insomnia is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Requestly's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients. However, they also have distinct specializations: Requestly extends into Browser Extensions.
Requestly provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Insomnia may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.