Learn how Insomnia and Requestly differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Insomnia and Requestly have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Insomnia significantly outpaces Requestly in community adoption with 39,956 stars compared to 6,750 stars on GitHub. This 5.9x difference suggests Insomnia has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Insomnia has 2,360 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Insomnia and Requestly are moving at much the same rate, adding 59 stars and adding 10 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.1% vs +0.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Insomnia last updated 10 hours ago and Requestly 15 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Insomnia uses C, Objective-C, C++ while Requestly leverages SCSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Insomnia beginning 10 years ago and Requestly 10 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Insomnia is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Requestly uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients. However, they also have distinct specializations: Requestly extends into Browser Extensions.
Requestly provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Insomnia may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.