Hoppscotch vs Requestly

Hoppscotch significantly outpaces Requestly in community adoption with 80,087 stars compared to 6,749 stars on GitHub. This 11.9x difference suggests Hoppscotch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hoppscotch has 6,049 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Hoppscotch and Requestly are moving at much the same rate, adding 194 stars and adding 8 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.2% vs +0.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

Both projects show recent activity, with Hoppscotch last updated 3 hours ago and Requestly 56 minutes ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hoppscotch uses Rust, Vue, Tauri, NestJS while Requestly leverages JSX.

Requestly has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Hoppscotch which began 7 years ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests Requestly may have more mature features and established processes.

Hoppscotch uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Requestly's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients. However, they also have distinct specializations: Requestly extends into Browser Extensions.

Requestly provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Hoppscotch may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.