Learn how Hoppscotch and Requestly differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Hoppscotch and Requestly have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hoppscotch significantly outpaces Requestly in community adoption with 78,981 stars compared to 6,637 stars on GitHub. This 11.9x difference suggests Hoppscotch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hoppscotch has 5,814 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hoppscotch last updated 24 hours ago and Requestly 6 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hoppscotch uses Rust, Vue, NestJS, Tauri while Requestly leverages JSX.
Requestly has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Hoppscotch which began 7 years ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests Requestly may have more mature features and established processes.
Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT, while Requestly's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients. However, they also have distinct specializations: Requestly extends into Browser Extensions.
Requestly provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Hoppscotch may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.