Learn how Hoppscotch and Yaak differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Hoppscotch appears to have several advantages over Yaak, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hoppscotch significantly outpaces Yaak in community adoption with 80,547 stars compared to 19,260 stars on GitHub. This 4.2x difference suggests Hoppscotch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hoppscotch has 6,133 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Hoppscotch and Yaak are moving at much the same rate, adding 428 stars and adding 126 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.5% vs +0.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hoppscotch last updated 1 day ago and Yaak 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Rust, Tauri. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hoppscotch uses SCSS, Vue, NestJS while Yaak leverages JSX, Python.
Hoppscotch has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Yaak which began 4 years ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests Hoppscotch may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients.
Hoppscotch provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Yaak may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.