Learn how Hoppscotch and Yaak differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Hoppscotch appears to have several advantages over Yaak, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hoppscotch significantly outpaces Yaak in community adoption with 80,250 stars compared to 19,176 stars on GitHub. This 4.2x difference suggests Hoppscotch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hoppscotch has 6,091 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Yaak is growing faster, adding 212 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 250 stars for Hoppscotch (+0.3%). Yaak is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hoppscotch last updated 23 hours ago and Yaak 15 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Rust, Tauri. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hoppscotch uses SCSS, Vue, NestJS while Yaak leverages JSX, Python.
Hoppscotch has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Yaak which began 4 years ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests Hoppscotch may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients.
Hoppscotch provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Yaak may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.