Learn how Hoppscotch and Yaak differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
2026.10.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
hoppscotch
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v2026.9.1License
MITRepository
yaakapp/app
Hoppscotch appears to have several advantages over Yaak, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hoppscotch significantly outpaces Yaak in community adoption with 80,766 stars compared to 19,456 stars on GitHub. This 4.2x difference suggests Hoppscotch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hoppscotch has 6,234 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Yaak is growing faster, adding 156 stars in the last 30 days (+0.8%) against adding 177 stars for Hoppscotch (+0.2%). Yaak is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hoppscotch last updated 3 days ago and Yaak 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Rust, Tauri. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hoppscotch uses SCSS, Vue, NestJS while Yaak leverages JSX, Python.
Hoppscotch has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Yaak which began 4 years ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests Hoppscotch may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients.
Hoppscotch provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Yaak may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.