Learn how Hoppscotch and Yaak differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Hoppscotch and Yaak have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hoppscotch significantly outpaces Yaak in community adoption with 80,058 stars compared to 19,086 stars on GitHub. This 4.2x difference suggests Hoppscotch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hoppscotch has 6,040 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Yaak is growing faster, adding 201 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 216 stars for Hoppscotch (+0.3%). Yaak is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hoppscotch last updated 3 days ago and Yaak 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Rust, Tauri. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hoppscotch uses SCSS, Vue, NestJS while Yaak leverages JSX, Python.
Hoppscotch has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Yaak which began 4 years ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests Hoppscotch may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients.