Learn how HTTPie and Yaak differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 years agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v2025.2.0License
BSD-3-ClauseRepository
httpie/desktop
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v2026.9.1License
MITRepository
yaakapp/app
Yaak appears to have several advantages over HTTPie, particularly in popularity, growth and activity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Yaak significantly outpaces HTTPie in community adoption with 19,456 stars compared to 4,055 stars on GitHub. This 4.8x difference suggests Yaak has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Yaak has 848 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Yaak is growing faster, adding 156 stars in the last 30 days (+0.8%) against adding 9 stars for HTTPie (+0.2%). Yaak is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Yaak shows more recent development activity with its last commit 10 hours ago, while HTTPie was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests Yaak is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HTTPie uses Ruby while Yaak leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Rust, Tauri.
HTTPie has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Yaak which began 4 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests HTTPie may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: HTTPie is licensed under BSD-3-Clause while Yaak uses MIT. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients.