Learn how HTTPie and Voiden differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 years agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v2025.2.0License
BSD-3-ClauseRepository
httpie/desktop
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v2.4.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
voidenhq/voiden
Both HTTPie and Voiden have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
HTTPie leads in popularity with 4,056 stars vs 1,787 stars for Voiden. The 127% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Voiden has 89 forks, indicating growing developer engagement.
Voiden is growing faster, adding 15 stars in the last 30 days (+0.8%) against adding 9 stars for HTTPie (+0.2%). Voiden is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Voiden shows more recent development activity with its last commit 5 days ago, while HTTPie was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests Voiden is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HTTPie uses Python, Ruby while Voiden leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS.
HTTPie has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Voiden which began 2 years ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests HTTPie may have more mature features and established processes.
HTTPie uses the BSD-3-Clause license, which is more permissive than Voiden's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients.