Learn how Insomnia and Voiden differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
13.4.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
kong/insomnia
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v2.4.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
voidenhq/voiden
Both Insomnia and Voiden have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Insomnia significantly outpaces Voiden in community adoption with 40,132 stars compared to 1,785 stars on GitHub. This 22.5x difference suggests Insomnia has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Insomnia has 2,389 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Voiden is growing faster, adding 17 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 100 stars for Insomnia (+0.2%). Voiden is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Insomnia last updated 9 hours ago and Voiden 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Insomnia uses C, Objective-C, C++ while Voiden leverages SCSS.
Insomnia has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Voiden which began 2 years ago. This 9.2-year head start suggests Insomnia may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients.