Learn how Hoppscotch and Insomnia differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Hoppscotch appears to have several advantages over Insomnia, particularly in popularity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hoppscotch leads in popularity with 80,119 stars vs 39,959 stars for Insomnia. The 101% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Hoppscotch has 6,063 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Hoppscotch and Insomnia are moving at much the same rate, adding 181 stars and adding 54 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.2% vs +0.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hoppscotch last updated 2 days ago and Insomnia 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hoppscotch uses SCSS, Rust, Vue, Tauri, NestJS while Insomnia leverages JSX, C, Objective-C, C++.
Insomnia has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Hoppscotch which began 7 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests Insomnia may have more mature features and established processes.
Hoppscotch uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Insomnia's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients.
Hoppscotch provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Insomnia may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.