Learn how Hoppscotch and Insomnia differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Both Hoppscotch and Insomnia have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hoppscotch leads in popularity with 79,676 stars vs 39,826 stars for Insomnia. The 100% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Hoppscotch has 5,947 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hoppscotch last updated 14 hours ago and Insomnia 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hoppscotch uses SCSS, Rust, Vue, NestJS, Tauri while Insomnia leverages JSX, C, Objective-C, C++.
Insomnia has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Hoppscotch which began 7 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests Insomnia may have more mature features and established processes.
Hoppscotch uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Insomnia's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients.