Learn how Hoppscotch and Insomnia differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Hoppscotch appears to have several advantages over Insomnia, particularly in popularity, growth, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hoppscotch leads in popularity with 80,592 stars vs 40,032 stars for Insomnia. The 101% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Hoppscotch has 6,149 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Hoppscotch is growing faster, adding 323 stars in the last 30 days (+0.4%) against adding 31 stars for Insomnia (+0.1%). Hoppscotch is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hoppscotch last updated 4 days ago and Insomnia 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hoppscotch uses SCSS, Rust, Vue, Tauri, NestJS while Insomnia leverages JSX, C, Objective-C, C++.
Insomnia has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Hoppscotch which began 7 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests Insomnia may have more mature features and established processes.
Hoppscotch uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Insomnia's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients.
Hoppscotch provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Insomnia may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.