Learn how Chapar and Insomnia differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.11.0License
BSD-3-ClauseRepository
chapar-rest/chapar
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
13.3.1License
Apache-2.0Repository
kong/insomnia
Both Chapar and Insomnia have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Insomnia significantly outpaces Chapar in community adoption with 40,079 stars compared to 719 stars on GitHub. This 55.7x difference suggests Insomnia has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Insomnia has 2,386 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Chapar is growing faster, adding 7 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 46 stars for Insomnia (+0.1%). Chapar is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Chapar last updated 1 day ago and Insomnia 6 hours ago.
Insomnia has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Chapar which began 3 years ago. This 7.8-year head start suggests Insomnia may have more mature features and established processes.
Chapar uses the BSD-3-Clause license, which is more permissive than Insomnia's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients.