Learn how Bruno and Insomnia differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Both Bruno and Insomnia have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Bruno having 45,029 stars and Insomnia having 38,889 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Bruno has 2,593 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bruno last updated 14 hours ago and Insomnia 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bruno uses SCSS while Insomnia leverages C, Objective-C, C++.
Insomnia has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Bruno which began 4 years ago. This 6.5-year head start suggests Insomnia may have more mature features and established processes.
Bruno uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Insomnia's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients.