Learn how Bruno and Insomnia differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v4.3.0License
MITRepository
usebruno/bruno
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
13.4.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
kong/insomnia
Both Bruno and Insomnia have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Bruno having 48,274 stars and Insomnia having 40,132 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Bruno has 3,087 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Bruno is growing faster, adding 857 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 100 stars for Insomnia (+0.2%). Bruno is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bruno last updated 2 days ago and Insomnia 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bruno uses SCSS while Insomnia leverages C, Objective-C, C++.
Insomnia has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Bruno which began 4 years ago. This 6.5-year head start suggests Insomnia may have more mature features and established processes.
Bruno uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Insomnia's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients.