Learn how Bruno and Insomnia differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Bruno and Insomnia have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Bruno having 46,408 stars and Insomnia having 39,956 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Bruno has 2,796 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Bruno is growing faster, adding 654 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 59 stars for Insomnia (+0.1%). Bruno is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bruno last updated 8 hours ago and Insomnia 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bruno uses SCSS while Insomnia leverages C, Objective-C, C++.
Insomnia has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Bruno which began 4 years ago. This 6.5-year head start suggests Insomnia may have more mature features and established processes.
Bruno uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Insomnia's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients.