Learn how Bruno and Requestly differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v4.3.0License
MITRepository
usebruno/bruno
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
2026.03.23License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
requestly/requestly
Both Bruno and Requestly have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Bruno significantly outpaces Requestly in community adoption with 48,274 stars compared to 6,758 stars on GitHub. This 7.1x difference suggests Bruno has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Bruno has 3,087 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Bruno is growing faster, adding 857 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 1 stars for Requestly (0%). Bruno is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bruno last updated 2 days ago and Requestly 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS.
Requestly has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Bruno which began 4 years ago. This 5.9-year head start suggests Requestly may have more mature features and established processes.
Bruno uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Requestly's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients. However, they also have distinct specializations: Requestly extends into Browser Extensions.
Requestly provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Bruno may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.