Learn how Requestly and Voiden differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
2026.03.23License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
requestly/requestly
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v2.4.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
voidenhq/voiden
Requestly appears to have several advantages over Voiden, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Requestly significantly outpaces Voiden in community adoption with 6,758 stars compared to 1,785 stars on GitHub. This 3.8x difference suggests Requestly has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Requestly has 684 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Voiden is growing faster, adding 17 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 1 stars for Requestly (0%). Voiden is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Requestly last updated 2 days ago and Voiden 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS.
Requestly has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Voiden which began 2 years ago. This 8.6-year head start suggests Requestly may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Requestly is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Voiden uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients. However, they also have distinct specializations: Requestly also focuses on Browser Extensions.
Requestly provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Voiden may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.