Learn how Hoppscotch and Voiden differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Hoppscotch appears to have several advantages over Voiden, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hoppscotch significantly outpaces Voiden in community adoption with 80,087 stars compared to 1,520 stars on GitHub. This 52.7x difference suggests Hoppscotch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hoppscotch has 6,049 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Voiden is growing faster, adding 117 stars in the last 30 days (+8.3%) against adding 194 stars for Hoppscotch (+0.2%). Voiden is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hoppscotch last updated 4 hours ago and Voiden 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hoppscotch uses Rust, Vue, Tauri, NestJS while Voiden leverages JSX.
Hoppscotch has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Voiden which began 1 year ago. This 5.8-year head start suggests Hoppscotch may have more mature features and established processes.
Hoppscotch uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Voiden's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients.