Logto – Modern auth infrastructure for developers. Add multi-tenancy, enterprise SSO, and RBAC to your SaaS or AI apps.Learn how Firecamp and Hoppscotch differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Hoppscotch appears to have several advantages over Firecamp, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hoppscotch significantly outpaces Firecamp in community adoption with 79,921 stars compared to 2,602 stars on GitHub. This 30.7x difference suggests Hoppscotch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hoppscotch has 5,999 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Hoppscotch shows more recent development activity with its last commit 21 hours ago, while Firecamp was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests Hoppscotch is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, SCSS, Rust, Tauri, NestJS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Firecamp uses JSX while Hoppscotch leverages Bash, Vue.
Hoppscotch has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Firecamp which began 3 years ago. This 3.8-year head start suggests Hoppscotch may have more mature features and established processes.
Hoppscotch uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Firecamp's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients. However, they also have distinct specializations: Firecamp also focuses on API Documentation Generators.
Firecampvs
YaakActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
