Learn how HTTPie and Requestly differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 1 year and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Requestly appears to have several advantages over HTTPie, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Requestly leads in popularity with 6,637 stars vs 3,918 stars for HTTPie. The 69% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Requestly has 637 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Requestly shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 days ago, while HTTPie was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests Requestly is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HTTPie uses Python, Ruby while Requestly leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS.
Requestly has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to HTTPie which began 4 years ago. This 5.1-year head start suggests Requestly may have more mature features and established processes.
HTTPie is licensed under BSD-3-Clause, while Requestly's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients. However, they also have distinct specializations: Requestly extends into Browser Extensions.
Requestly provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while HTTPie may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.