Learn how HTTPie and Insomnia differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api clients is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 1 year and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Insomnia appears to have several advantages over HTTPie, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Insomnia significantly outpaces HTTPie in community adoption with 38,328 stars compared to 3,918 stars on GitHub. This 9.8x difference suggests Insomnia has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Insomnia has 2,279 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Insomnia shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 days ago, while HTTPie was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests Insomnia is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HTTPie uses Python, Ruby while Insomnia leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, C, Objective-C, C++.
Insomnia has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to HTTPie which began 4 years ago. This 5.7-year head start suggests Insomnia may have more mature features and established processes.
HTTPie uses the BSD-3-Clause license, which is more permissive than Insomnia's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Clients.