Ad
 
Learn more

Focalboard vs Tillywork

Learn how Focalboard and Tillywork differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these agile project management tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Focalboard

Focalboard

Open-source project management tool for teams. Create kanban boards, tables, and tasks to streamline workflows and boost productivity.
  • Stars


    26,042
  • Forks


    2,529
  • Last commit


    4 days ago
  • Repository age


    6 years
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Focalboard
Favicon of Tillywork

Tillywork

Comprehensive work management platform for B2B teams featuring project management, sales CRM, agile workflows, and advanced reporting - all in one free solution.
  • Stars


    1,287
  • Forks


    96
  • Last commit


    9 months ago
  • Repository age


    2 years
  • License


    MIT
View Repository

Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 9 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Tillywork

Detailed Comparison

Focalboard appears to have several advantages over Tillywork, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Focalboard wins
Community & Popularity

Focalboard significantly outpaces Tillywork in community adoption with 26,042 stars compared to 1,287 stars on GitHub. This 20.2x difference suggests Focalboard has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Focalboard has 2,529 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Focalboard wins
Development Activity

Focalboard shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 days ago, while Tillywork was last updated 9 months ago. This suggests Focalboard is being more actively maintained.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Focalboard uses JSX, Golang, Swift, C# while Tillywork leverages CSS, Vue, NestJS.

Focalboard wins
Project Maturity

Focalboard has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Tillywork which began 2 years ago. This 3.6-year head start suggests Focalboard may have more mature features and established processes.

Tillywork wins
Licensing

Tillywork is licensed under MIT, while Focalboard's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Agile Project Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Focalboard also focuses on Project Management Suites, Collaborative Workspaces while Tillywork extends into Project & Work Management.

Focalboard wins
Hosting & Deployment

Focalboard provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tillywork may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.