Learn how Planka and Tillywork differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these agile project management tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 9 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Planka appears to have several advantages over Tillywork, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Planka significantly outpaces Tillywork in community adoption with 11,844 stars compared to 1,287 stars on GitHub. This 9.2x difference suggests Planka has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Planka has 1,237 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Planka shows more recent development activity with its last commit 8 days ago, while Tillywork was last updated 9 months ago. This suggests Planka is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Planka uses JSX, Python while Tillywork leverages Typescript, Vue, NestJS.
Planka has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Tillywork which began 2 years ago. This 4.7-year head start suggests Planka may have more mature features and established processes.
Tillywork is licensed under MIT, while Planka's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Agile Project Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Planka also focuses on Project Management Suites, Task Management while Tillywork extends into Project & Work Management.
Planka provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tillywork may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs