Learn how Cap and mCaptcha differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these captcha & bot protection tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 7 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Both Cap and mCaptcha have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cap leads in popularity with 6,269 stars vs 2,445 stars for mCaptcha. The 156% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Cap has 431 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Cap shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 days ago, while mCaptcha was last updated 7 months ago. This suggests Cap is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cap uses Vue while mCaptcha leverages Bash, SCSS.
mCaptcha has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Cap which began 1 year ago. This 3.9-year head start suggests mCaptcha may have more mature features and established processes.
mCaptcha is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Cap's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CAPTCHA & Bot Protection.
Both Cap and mCaptcha offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.