Learn how mCaptcha and Mosparo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these captcha & bot protection tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 year agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v0.1.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
mcaptcha/mcaptcha
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v1.5.12License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
mosparo/mosparo
Mosparo appears to have several advantages over mCaptcha, particularly in growth, activity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
mCaptcha significantly outpaces Mosparo in community adoption with 2,497 stars compared to 313 stars on GitHub. This 8.0x difference suggests mCaptcha has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, mCaptcha has 95 forks, indicating growing developer engagement.
Mosparo is growing faster, adding 5 stars in the last 30 days (+1.6%) against adding 4 stars for mCaptcha (+0.2%). Mosparo is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Mosparo shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 days ago, while mCaptcha was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests Mosparo is being more actively maintained.
Both projects started around the same time, with mCaptcha beginning 6 years ago and Mosparo 5 years ago.
Mosparo uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than mCaptcha's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CAPTCHA & Bot Protection.
Both mCaptcha and Mosparo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.