Learn how ALTCHA and Mosparo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these captcha & bot protection tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v3.5.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
altcha-org/altcha
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v1.5.12License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
mosparo/mosparo
Both ALTCHA and Mosparo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ALTCHA significantly outpaces Mosparo in community adoption with 2,850 stars compared to 313 stars on GitHub. This 9.1x difference suggests ALTCHA has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, ALTCHA has 144 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
ALTCHA is growing faster, adding 71 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 5 stars for Mosparo (+1.6%). ALTCHA is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with ALTCHA last updated 4 days ago and Mosparo 3 days ago.
Mosparo has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to ALTCHA which began 3 years ago. This 2.5-year head start suggests Mosparo may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CAPTCHA & Bot Protection.
Both ALTCHA and Mosparo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.