Learn how Cap and Mosparo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these captcha & bot protection tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
4.0.15License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
tiagozip/cap
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v1.5.14License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
mosparo/mosparo
Both Cap and Mosparo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cap significantly outpaces Mosparo in community adoption with 8,421 stars compared to 315 stars on GitHub. This 26.7x difference suggests Cap has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cap has 658 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Cap is growing faster, adding 375 stars in the last 30 days (+4.7%) against adding 5 stars for Mosparo (+1.6%). Cap is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cap last updated 5 hours ago and Mosparo 2 days ago.
Mosparo has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Cap which began 2 years ago. This 3.6-year head start suggests Mosparo may have more mature features and established processes.
Mosparo uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Cap's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CAPTCHA & Bot Protection.
Both Cap and Mosparo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.