Learn how Cap and Private Captcha differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these captcha & bot protection tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
3.1.13License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
tiagozip/cap
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.46.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
privatecaptcha
Cap appears to have several advantages over Private Captcha, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cap significantly outpaces Private Captcha in community adoption with 8,282 stars compared to 199 stars on GitHub. This 41.6x difference suggests Cap has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cap has 642 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Cap is growing faster, adding 319 stars in the last 30 days (+4%) against adding 4 stars for Private Captcha (+2.1%). Cap is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cap last updated 1 day ago and Private Captcha 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cap uses Rust, Vue while Private Captcha leverages Bash, Golang.
Private Captcha has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Cap which began 2 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Private Captcha may have more mature features and established processes.
Cap is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Private Captcha's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CAPTCHA & Bot Protection.
Both Cap and Private Captcha offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.