Learn how mCaptcha and Private Captcha differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these captcha & bot protection tools is best for you.
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 6 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

mCaptcha appears to have several advantages over Private Captcha, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
mCaptcha significantly outpaces Private Captcha in community adoption with 2,436 stars compared to 165 stars on GitHub. This 14.8x difference suggests mCaptcha has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, mCaptcha has 87 forks, indicating growing developer engagement.
Private Captcha shows more recent development activity with its last commit 10 hours ago, while mCaptcha was last updated 6 months ago. This suggests Private Captcha is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: mCaptcha uses SCSS, Rust while Private Captcha leverages Golang.
mCaptcha has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Private Captcha which began 2 years ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests mCaptcha may have more mature features and established processes.
mCaptcha is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Private Captcha's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CAPTCHA & Bot Protection.
Both mCaptcha and Private Captcha offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.