What is the main difference between Friendly Captcha and mCaptcha?

Friendly Captcha and mCaptcha are both captcha & bot protection tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Friendly Captcha or mCaptcha?

The choice between Friendly Captcha and mCaptcha depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Friendly Captcha to mCaptcha?

Migration between Friendly Captcha and mCaptcha is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn More

Learn more

Friendly Captcha vs mCaptcha

Learn how Friendly Captcha and mCaptcha differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these captcha & bot protection tools is best for you.

Friendly Captcha

Privacy-compliant CAPTCHA alternative using proof-of-work technology. Protects websites from bots and spam without user interaction or data tracking.

Visit Friendly Captcha Read more

Stars
24
Forks
10
Last commit
21 days ago
Repository age
2 years
License
MPL-2.0

View Repository

Auto-fetched 9 hours ago.

mCaptcha

Privacy-focused proof-of-work CAPTCHA system that silently protects websites without tracking users or requiring image solving. Drop-in replacement for reCAPTCHA.

Visit mCaptcha Read more

Stars
2,445
Forks
88
Last commit
7 months ago
Repository age
5 years
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 7 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.

Auto-fetched 9 hours ago.

Detailed Comparison

mCaptcha appears to have several advantages over Friendly Captcha, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

mCaptcha wins

Community & Popularity

mCaptcha significantly outpaces Friendly Captcha in community adoption with 2,445 stars compared to 24 stars on GitHub. This 101.9x difference suggests mCaptcha has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, mCaptcha has 88 forks, indicating growing developer engagement.

Friendly Captcha wins

Development Activity

Friendly Captcha shows more recent development activity with its last commit 21 days ago, while mCaptcha was last updated 7 months ago. This suggests Friendly Captcha is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Friendly Captcha uses Golang while mCaptcha leverages CSS, SCSS, Rust.

mCaptcha wins

Project Maturity

mCaptcha has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Friendly Captcha which began 2 years ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests mCaptcha may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Friendly Captcha is licensed under MPL-2.0 while mCaptcha uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in CAPTCHA & Bot Protection.

mCaptcha wins

Hosting & Deployment

mCaptcha provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Friendly Captcha may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider