Learn how Friendly Captcha and mCaptcha differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these captcha & bot protection tools is best for you.

mCaptcha appears to have several advantages over Friendly Captcha, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
mCaptcha significantly outpaces Friendly Captcha in community adoption with 2,477 stars compared to 30 stars on GitHub. This 82.6x difference suggests mCaptcha has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, mCaptcha has 94 forks, indicating growing developer engagement.
Friendly Captcha shows more recent development activity with its last commit 18 days ago, while mCaptcha was last updated 10 months ago. This suggests Friendly Captcha is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Friendly Captcha uses Golang while mCaptcha leverages CSS, SCSS, Rust.
mCaptcha has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Friendly Captcha which began 3 years ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests mCaptcha may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Friendly Captcha is licensed under MPL-2.0 while mCaptcha uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CAPTCHA & Bot Protection.
mCaptcha provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Friendly Captcha may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
License
Self-hosted
Repository