Learn how Cap and Friendly Captcha differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these captcha & bot protection tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
3.1.13License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
tiagozip/cap
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
1.1.3License
MPL-2.0Repository
friendly-captcha-sdk
Both Cap and Friendly Captcha have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cap significantly outpaces Friendly Captcha in community adoption with 8,254 stars compared to 37 stars on GitHub. This 223.1x difference suggests Cap has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cap has 639 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cap last updated 7 days ago and Friendly Captcha 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cap uses CSS, Rust, Vue while Friendly Captcha leverages Bash, Golang.
Friendly Captcha has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Cap which began 2 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Friendly Captcha may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Cap is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Friendly Captcha uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CAPTCHA & Bot Protection.
Cap provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Friendly Captcha may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.