Learn how Cap and Procaptcha differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these captcha & bot protection tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
3.1.13License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
tiagozip/cap
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v3.10.7License
Apache-2.0Repository
prosopo/captcha
Cap appears to have several advantages over Procaptcha, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cap significantly outpaces Procaptcha in community adoption with 8,282 stars compared to 303 stars on GitHub. This 27.3x difference suggests Cap has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cap has 642 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Cap is growing faster, adding 319 stars in the last 30 days (+4%) against adding 2 stars for Procaptcha (+0.7%). Cap is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cap last updated 1 day ago and Procaptcha 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cap uses Rust while Procaptcha leverages Bash, JSX, Swift, Kotlin.
Procaptcha has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Cap which began 2 years ago. This 1.7-year head start suggests Procaptcha may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CAPTCHA & Bot Protection.
Cap provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Procaptcha may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.