Learn how mCaptcha and Procaptcha differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these captcha & bot protection tools is best for you.
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 7 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

mCaptcha appears to have several advantages over Procaptcha, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
mCaptcha significantly outpaces Procaptcha in community adoption with 2,445 stars compared to 295 stars on GitHub. This 8.3x difference suggests mCaptcha has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, mCaptcha has 88 forks, indicating growing developer engagement.
Procaptcha shows more recent development activity with its last commit 17 hours ago, while mCaptcha was last updated 7 months ago. This suggests Procaptcha is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: mCaptcha uses SCSS, Rust while Procaptcha leverages JSX, Vue, Swift, Kotlin.
mCaptcha has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Procaptcha which began 3 years ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests mCaptcha may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: mCaptcha is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Procaptcha uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CAPTCHA & Bot Protection.
mCaptcha provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Procaptcha may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.