Learn how ALTCHA and Cap differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these captcha & bot protection tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
17 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v3.5.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
altcha-org/altcha
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
3.1.13License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
tiagozip/cap
Both ALTCHA and Cap have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cap leads in popularity with 8,282 stars vs 2,884 stars for ALTCHA. The 187% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Cap has 642 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Cap is growing faster, adding 319 stars in the last 30 days (+4%) against adding 77 stars for ALTCHA (+2.7%). Cap is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with ALTCHA last updated 17 days ago and Cap 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cap leverages Rust, Vue.
ALTCHA has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Cap which began 2 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests ALTCHA may have more mature features and established processes.
ALTCHA uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Cap's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CAPTCHA & Bot Protection.
Both ALTCHA and Cap offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.