Learn how ALTCHA and Cap differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these captcha & bot protection tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both ALTCHA and Cap have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cap leads in popularity with 8,090 stars vs 2,830 stars for ALTCHA. The 186% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Cap has 622 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Cap is growing faster, adding 281 stars in the last 30 days (+3.6%) against adding 69 stars for ALTCHA (+2.5%). Cap is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with ALTCHA last updated 15 hours ago and Cap 7 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cap leverages Rust, Vue.
ALTCHA has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Cap which began 2 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests ALTCHA may have more mature features and established processes.
ALTCHA uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Cap's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CAPTCHA & Bot Protection.
Both ALTCHA and Cap offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.