Learn how Sure.am and YAFFA differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these budgeting apps is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Sure.am and YAFFA have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Sure.am significantly outpaces YAFFA in community adoption with 9,532 stars compared to 108 stars on GitHub. This 88.3x difference suggests Sure.am has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Sure.am has 379 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Sure.am is growing faster, adding 445 stars in the last 30 days (+4.9%) against adding 1 stars for YAFFA (+0.9%). Sure.am is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Sure.am last updated 2 days ago and YAFFA 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Sure.am uses C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, Dart while YAFFA leverages SCSS, Vue, PHP, Laravel.
YAFFA has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Sure.am which began 1 year ago. This 4.9-year head start suggests YAFFA may have more mature features and established processes.
YAFFA uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Sure.am's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps, Investment Tracking.
Both Sure.am and YAFFA offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.