Learn how Actual and Sure.am differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these budgeting apps is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Actual appears to have several advantages over Sure.am, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Actual significantly outpaces Sure.am in community adoption with 26,012 stars compared to 7,816 stars on GitHub. This 3.3x difference suggests Actual has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Actual has 2,348 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Actual last updated 12 hours ago and Sure.am 23 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Actual uses Typescript, JSX, SCSS while Sure.am leverages CSS, C, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB, Dart.
Actual has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Sure.am which began 9 months ago. This 3.3-year head start suggests Actual may have more mature features and established processes.
Actual uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Sure.am's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps. However, they also have distinct specializations: Sure.am extends into Investment Tracking.
Both Actual and Sure.am offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.