Actual significantly outpaces Sure.am in community adoption with 27,840 stars compared to 9,201 stars on GitHub. This 3.0x difference suggests Actual has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Actual has 2,765 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Both projects show recent activity, with Actual last updated 5 hours ago and Sure.am 7 hours ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Actual uses Typescript, JSX, SCSS while Sure.am leverages CSS, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, Dart.

Actual has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Sure.am which began 1 year ago. This 3.3-year head start suggests Actual may have more mature features and established processes.

Actual uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Sure.am's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps. However, they also have distinct specializations: Sure.am extends into Investment Tracking.

Both Actual and Sure.am offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.