Learn how Actual and Sure.am differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these budgeting apps is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Actual appears to have several advantages over Sure.am, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Actual leads in popularity with 28,235 stars vs 9,532 stars for Sure.am. The 196% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Actual has 2,857 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Sure.am is growing faster, adding 445 stars in the last 30 days (+4.9%) against adding 625 stars for Actual (+2.3%). Sure.am is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Actual last updated 7 hours ago and Sure.am 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Actual uses Typescript, JSX, SCSS while Sure.am leverages CSS, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, Dart.
Actual has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Sure.am which began 1 year ago. This 3.3-year head start suggests Actual may have more mature features and established processes.
Actual uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Sure.am's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps. However, they also have distinct specializations: Sure.am extends into Investment Tracking.
Both Actual and Sure.am offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.