Learn how Monetr and Sure.am differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these budgeting apps is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
19 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v1.21.1License
FSL-1.1-MITRepository
monetr/monetr
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v0.7.6License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
we-promise/sure
Sure.am appears to have several advantages over Monetr, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Sure.am significantly outpaces Monetr in community adoption with 10,926 stars compared to 691 stars on GitHub. This 15.8x difference suggests Sure.am has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Sure.am has 749 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Sure.am is growing faster, adding 484 stars in the last 30 days (+4.6%) against adding 1 stars for Monetr (+0.1%). Sure.am is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Monetr last updated 19 hours ago and Sure.am 13 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Monetr uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang, SCSS while Sure.am leverages C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, Dart.
Monetr has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Sure.am which began 1 year ago. This 3.9-year head start suggests Monetr may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Monetr is licensed under FSL-1.1-MIT while Sure.am uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps. However, they also have distinct specializations: Sure.am extends into Investment Tracking.
Sure.am provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Monetr may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.