Learn how Ghostfolio and Sure.am differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these investment tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Ghostfolio and Sure.am have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Ghostfolio having 9,377 stars and Sure.am having 10,320 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Ghostfolio has 1,339 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Sure.am is growing faster, adding 665 stars in the last 30 days (+6.9%) against adding 161 stars for Ghostfolio (+1.7%). Sure.am is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ghostfolio last updated 16 hours ago and Sure.am 5 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ghostfolio uses Bash, Typescript, SCSS while Sure.am leverages C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, Dart.
Ghostfolio has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Sure.am which began 1 year ago. This 4.3-year head start suggests Ghostfolio may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Investment Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Sure.am extends into Budgeting Apps.
Both Ghostfolio and Sure.am offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.