Learn how Ghostfolio and Wealthfolio differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these investment tracking tools is best for you.

Both Ghostfolio and Wealthfolio have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Ghostfolio and Wealthfolio show comparable community engagement with 9,108 and 8,601 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Ghostfolio has 1,265 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Wealthfolio is growing faster, adding 399 stars in the last 30 days (+4.9%) against adding 164 stars for Ghostfolio (+1.8%). Wealthfolio is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ghostfolio last updated 2 hours ago and Wealthfolio 5 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ghostfolio uses Bash, SCSS while Wealthfolio leverages JSX, Rust, Tauri.
Ghostfolio has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Wealthfolio which began 2 years ago. This 3.2-year head start suggests Ghostfolio may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Investment Tracking, Finance & Fintech.
Both Ghostfolio and Wealthfolio offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository