Learn how Ghostfolio and Wealthfolio differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these investment tracking tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Ghostfolio appears to have several advantages over Wealthfolio, particularly in maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Ghostfolio having 8,275 stars and Wealthfolio having 7,331 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Ghostfolio has 1,102 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ghostfolio last updated 19 hours ago and Wealthfolio 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ghostfolio uses Bash, SCSS while Wealthfolio leverages JSX, Rust, Tauri.
Ghostfolio has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Wealthfolio which began 2 years ago. This 3.2-year head start suggests Ghostfolio may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Investment Tracking, Finance & Fintech.
Ghostfolio provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Wealthfolio may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.