Learn how Ghostfolio and Wealthfolio differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these investment tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
3.94.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
ghostfolio
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v3.11.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
afadil/wealthfolio
Both Ghostfolio and Wealthfolio have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Ghostfolio and Wealthfolio show comparable community engagement with 9,622 and 9,294 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Ghostfolio has 1,387 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Ghostfolio and Wealthfolio are moving at much the same rate, adding 232 stars and adding 202 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+2.5% vs +2.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ghostfolio last updated 13 hours ago and Wealthfolio 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ghostfolio uses Bash, SCSS while Wealthfolio leverages JSX, Rust, Tauri.
Ghostfolio has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Wealthfolio which began 2 years ago. This 3.2-year head start suggests Ghostfolio may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Investment Tracking.
Both Ghostfolio and Wealthfolio offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.