Learn how Ghostfolio and YAFFA differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these investment tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Ghostfolio and YAFFA have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ghostfolio significantly outpaces YAFFA in community adoption with 9,221 stars compared to 108 stars on GitHub. This 85.4x difference suggests Ghostfolio has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ghostfolio has 1,287 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Ghostfolio is growing faster, adding 173 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 0 stars for YAFFA (0%). Ghostfolio is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ghostfolio last updated 4 hours ago and YAFFA 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ghostfolio uses Bash, Typescript while YAFFA leverages Vue, PHP, Laravel.
Both projects started around the same time, with Ghostfolio beginning 5 years ago and YAFFA 6 years ago.
YAFFA uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Ghostfolio's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Investment Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ghostfolio also focuses on Finance & Fintech while YAFFA extends into Budgeting Apps.
Both Ghostfolio and YAFFA offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.