Learn how Ghostfolio and YAFFA differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these investment tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Ghostfolio and YAFFA have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ghostfolio significantly outpaces YAFFA in community adoption with 9,434 stars compared to 110 stars on GitHub. This 85.8x difference suggests Ghostfolio has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ghostfolio has 1,353 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Ghostfolio and YAFFA are moving at much the same rate, adding 164 stars and adding 2 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.8% vs +1.9%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ghostfolio last updated 8 hours ago and YAFFA 5 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ghostfolio uses Bash, Typescript while YAFFA leverages Vue, PHP, Laravel.
Both projects started around the same time, with Ghostfolio beginning 5 years ago and YAFFA 6 years ago.
YAFFA uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Ghostfolio's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Investment Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: YAFFA extends into Budgeting Apps.
Both Ghostfolio and YAFFA offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.