What is the main difference between Firefly III and YAFFA?

Firefly III and YAFFA are both budgeting apps but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Firefly III or YAFFA?

The choice between Firefly III and YAFFA depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Firefly III to YAFFA?

Migration between Firefly III and YAFFA is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.

Learn More

Firefly III vs YAFFA

Learn how Firefly III and YAFFA differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these budgeting apps is best for you.

Firefly III

Track transactions, budgets, and accounts with a double-entry system, multi-currency support, rule engine, and REST API. Fully self-hostable.

Visit Firefly III Read more

24,470stars+273(+1.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
12 hours ago
Repository age
12 years
Version
v6.6.6
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
firefly-iii/firefly-iii

Sponsor Firefly III ongithub.com

YAFFA

YAFFA is a powerful, open-source budget app for managing expenses, budgets, and investments with secure self-hosting.

Visit YAFFA Read more

108stars

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
v3.6.1
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
kantorge/yaffa

Detailed Comparison

Firefly III appears to have several advantages over YAFFA, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Firefly III wins

Community & Popularity

Firefly III significantly outpaces YAFFA in community adoption with 24,470 stars compared to 108 stars on GitHub. This 226.6x difference suggests Firefly III has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Firefly III has 2,272 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Firefly III wins

Growth Momentum

Firefly III is growing faster, adding 273 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 0 stars for YAFFA (0%). Firefly III is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Firefly III last updated 12 hours ago and YAFFA 1 day ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, SCSS, Vue, PHP, Laravel. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Firefly III uses Bash.

Firefly III wins

Project Maturity

Firefly III has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to YAFFA which began 6 years ago. This 6.3-year head start suggests Firefly III may have more mature features and established processes.

YAFFA wins

Licensing

YAFFA uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Firefly III's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps. However, they also have distinct specializations: Firefly III also focuses on Personal Finance Management while YAFFA extends into Investment Tracking.

Comparable