Learn how Actual and Firefly III differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these budgeting apps is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Actual and Firefly III have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Actual having 28,490 stars and Firefly III having 24,470 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Actual has 2,921 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Actual is growing faster, adding 619 stars in the last 30 days (+2.2%) against adding 273 stars for Firefly III (+1.1%). Actual is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Actual last updated 4 hours ago and Firefly III 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Actual uses Typescript, JSX while Firefly III leverages CSS, Bash, Vue, PHP, Laravel.
Firefly III has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Actual which began 4 years ago. This 7.9-year head start suggests Firefly III may have more mature features and established processes.
Actual uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Firefly III's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps. However, they also have distinct specializations: Firefly III extends into Personal Finance Management.
Both Actual and Firefly III offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.