Learn how Actual and Firefly III differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these budgeting apps is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Actual and Firefly III have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Actual having 26,518 stars and Firefly III having 23,302 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Actual has 2,453 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Actual last updated 10 hours ago and Firefly III 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Actual uses Typescript, JSX while Firefly III leverages CSS, Bash, PHP, Vue, Laravel.
Firefly III has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Actual which began 4 years ago. This 7.9-year head start suggests Firefly III may have more mature features and established processes.
Actual uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Firefly III's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps. However, they also have distinct specializations: Firefly III extends into Personal Finance Management.
Actual provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Firefly III may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.