Learn how Actual and ezBookkeeping differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these budgeting apps is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Actual and ezBookkeeping have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Actual significantly outpaces ezBookkeeping in community adoption with 26,711 stars compared to 4,978 stars on GitHub. This 5.4x difference suggests Actual has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Actual has 2,494 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Actual last updated 12 hours ago and ezBookkeeping 3 days ago.
ezBookkeeping has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Actual which began 4 years ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests ezBookkeeping may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps. However, they also have distinct specializations: ezBookkeeping extends into Accounting Software.
Both Actual and ezBookkeeping offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.