Learn how Actual and ezBookkeeping differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these budgeting apps is best for you.
Activity score

Activity score

Both Actual and ezBookkeeping have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Actual significantly outpaces ezBookkeeping in community adoption with 27,072 stars compared to 5,071 stars on GitHub. This 5.3x difference suggests Actual has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Actual has 2,576 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Actual last updated 15 hours ago and ezBookkeeping 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Actual uses JSX while ezBookkeeping leverages Bash, Golang, Vue.
ezBookkeeping has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Actual which began 4 years ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests ezBookkeeping may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps. However, they also have distinct specializations: ezBookkeeping extends into Accounting Software.
Both Actual and ezBookkeeping offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.