Learn how Actual and Financial Freedom differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these budgeting apps is best for you.

Actual appears to have several advantages over Financial Freedom, particularly in popularity, activity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Actual significantly outpaces Financial Freedom in community adoption with 27,840 stars compared to 2,891 stars on GitHub. This 9.6x difference suggests Actual has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Actual has 2,765 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Actual shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 hours ago, while Financial Freedom was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests Actual is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Actual uses JSX, SCSS while Financial Freedom leverages CSS, Vue, PHP, Laravel.
Financial Freedom has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Actual which began 4 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Financial Freedom may have more mature features and established processes.
Actual uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Financial Freedom's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps.
Both Actual and Financial Freedom offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
License
Self-hosted
Repository