Learn how Actual and Financial Freedom differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these budgeting apps is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Actual appears to have several advantages over Financial Freedom, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Actual significantly outpaces Financial Freedom in community adoption with 29,213 stars compared to 2,927 stars on GitHub. This 10.0x difference suggests Actual has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Actual has 3,045 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Actual is growing faster, adding 751 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 8 stars for Financial Freedom (+0.3%). Actual is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Actual last updated 10 hours ago and Financial Freedom 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Actual uses JSX, SCSS while Financial Freedom leverages CSS, Vue, PHP, Laravel.
Financial Freedom has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Actual which began 4 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Financial Freedom may have more mature features and established processes.
Actual uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Financial Freedom's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps.
Both Actual and Financial Freedom offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.