Learn how ezBookkeeping and YAFFA differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these budgeting apps is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

ezBookkeeping appears to have several advantages over YAFFA, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ezBookkeeping significantly outpaces YAFFA in community adoption with 5,427 stars compared to 108 stars on GitHub. This 50.3x difference suggests ezBookkeeping has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, ezBookkeeping has 646 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
ezBookkeeping is growing faster, adding 171 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 1 stars for YAFFA (+0.9%). ezBookkeeping is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with ezBookkeeping last updated 9 hours ago and YAFFA 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, SCSS, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: ezBookkeeping uses Bash, Typescript, Golang while YAFFA leverages CSS, PHP, Laravel.
Both projects started around the same time, with ezBookkeeping beginning 6 years ago and YAFFA 6 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps. However, they also have distinct specializations: ezBookkeeping also focuses on Accounting Software while YAFFA extends into Investment Tracking.
Both ezBookkeeping and YAFFA offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.