Learn how Wealthfolio and YAFFA differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these investment tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Wealthfolio and YAFFA have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Wealthfolio significantly outpaces YAFFA in community adoption with 9,073 stars compared to 108 stars on GitHub. This 84.0x difference suggests Wealthfolio has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Wealthfolio has 728 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Wealthfolio is growing faster, adding 311 stars in the last 30 days (+3.5%) against adding 0 stars for YAFFA (0%). Wealthfolio is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Wealthfolio last updated 10 hours ago and YAFFA 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Wealthfolio uses Typescript, JSX, Rust, Tauri while YAFFA leverages SCSS, Vue, PHP, Laravel.
YAFFA has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Wealthfolio which began 2 years ago. This 3.7-year head start suggests YAFFA may have more mature features and established processes.
YAFFA uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Wealthfolio's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Investment Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: YAFFA extends into Budgeting Apps.
Both Wealthfolio and YAFFA offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.