Learn how Sure.am and Wealthfolio differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these investment tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Sure.am and Wealthfolio have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Sure.am having 9,532 stars and Wealthfolio having 8,665 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Wealthfolio has 647 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Sure.am is growing faster, adding 445 stars in the last 30 days (+4.9%) against adding 338 stars for Wealthfolio (+4.1%). Sure.am is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Sure.am last updated 2 days ago and Wealthfolio 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Sure.am uses C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB, Dart while Wealthfolio leverages Typescript, JSX, Rust, Tauri.
Wealthfolio has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to Sure.am which began 1 year ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests Wealthfolio may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Investment Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Sure.am also focuses on Budgeting Apps while Wealthfolio extends into Finance & Fintech.
Both Sure.am and Wealthfolio offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.