Learn how OpenCode and SWE-agent differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both OpenCode and SWE-agent have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenCode significantly outpaces SWE-agent in community adoption with 204,313 stars compared to 20,224 stars on GitHub. This 10.1x difference suggests OpenCode has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenCode has 26,653 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenCode is growing faster, adding 10,063 stars in the last 30 days (+5.2%) against adding 212 stars for SWE-agent (+1.1%). OpenCode is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenCode last updated 2 days ago and SWE-agent 6 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenCode uses Typescript, JSX, Rust, Tauri while SWE-agent leverages Bash, Python.
SWE-agent has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to OpenCode which began 1 year ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests SWE-agent may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents.