Learn how Kilo and OpenCode differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

OpenCode appears to have several advantages over Kilo, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenCode significantly outpaces Kilo in community adoption with 200,278 stars compared to 26,972 stars on GitHub. This 7.4x difference suggests OpenCode has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenCode has 25,869 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenCode is growing faster, adding 11,313 stars in the last 30 days (+6%) against adding 492 stars for Kilo (+1.9%). OpenCode is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kilo last updated 15 hours ago and OpenCode 5 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kilo uses Bash, Python, Next.js, Golang, PHP while OpenCode leverages Rust, Tauri.
Both projects started around the same time, with Kilo beginning 1 year ago and OpenCode 1 year ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kilo also focuses on IDEs & Code Editors.