Logto – Modern auth infrastructure for developers. Add multi-tenancy, enterprise SSO, and RBAC to your SaaS or AI apps.Learn how Grok Build and OpenCode differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
OpenCode appears to have several advantages over Grok Build, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenCode significantly outpaces Grok Build in community adoption with 196,743 stars compared to 24,893 stars on GitHub. This 7.9x difference suggests OpenCode has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenCode has 25,290 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Grok Build is growing faster, adding 13,663 stars in the last 30 days (+122%) against adding 10,984 stars for OpenCode (+5.9%). Grok Build is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Grok Build last updated 8 hours ago and OpenCode 1 hour ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Grok Build uses Bash, Python while OpenCode leverages CSS, Typescript, JSX, Tauri.
OpenCode has been in development longer, starting 1 year ago, compared to Grok Build which began 29 days ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests OpenCode may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenCode uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Grok Build's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents.
