Learn how OpenCode and Zero differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 hour agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v1.19.4License
MITRepository
sst/opencode
Last 30 days
Last commit
19 hours agoRepository age
5 monthsVersion
v0.11.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
gitlawb/zero
OpenCode appears to have several advantages over Zero, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenCode significantly outpaces Zero in community adoption with 221,673 stars compared to 1,744 stars on GitHub. This 127.1x difference suggests OpenCode has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenCode has 29,640 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenCode is growing faster, adding 11,463 stars in the last 30 days (+5.5%) against adding 62 stars for Zero (+3.7%). OpenCode is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenCode last updated 1 hour ago and Zero 19 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenCode uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, Rust, Tauri while Zero leverages Bash, Golang, Ruby.
OpenCode has been in development longer, starting 1 year ago, compared to Zero which began 5 months ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests OpenCode may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents.
Zero provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenCode may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.