Learn how OpenHands and Zero differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Stars
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

OpenHands appears to have several advantages over Zero, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenHands significantly outpaces Zero in community adoption with 85,176 stars compared to 1,631 stars on GitHub. This 52.2x difference suggests OpenHands has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenHands has 11,135 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenHands is growing faster, adding 2,870 stars in the last 30 days (+3.5%) against adding 4 stars for Zero (+0.2%). OpenHands is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenHands last updated 5 hours ago and Zero 11 hours ago.
OpenHands has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to Zero which began 3 months ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests OpenHands may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents.
Both OpenHands and Zero offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.